It scares the hell out of me.
It has all the dynamics of propaganda.
In U.S. history, I think about the many race riots. It wasn't until 1965 with the Watts Riots that rioting didn't involve attacks by whites on blacks.
(Goggle image)
Riots like the 1863 Draft riot in New York
(Goggle image)
began after an extensive news blitz in New York press of Northerners having to fight to free slaves.
There were massacres in places like Rosewood, FL and Greenbough S.C., where unsupported reports of black men raping white woman where broadcast and printed daily for weeks. It is said that even the most liberal whites supported the attacks after, hearing or reading the negative reports on a daily basis.
In recent times in Los Angeles in 1971, the local news media began to simultaneously broadcast reports of gang activity. I remember the headlines like it was yesterday, "Southland gang terrorizes Los Angeles."
When in fact the so called gang incidences were unrelated. A shooting on Piru St in Compton, a man robbed for his leather coat and killed at the Palladium Theater in Hollywood, a group of kids in Watts, ages 9-11 threw rocks and killed a Ice Cream truck driver and killed him. The Ice Cream truck driver was reported by many of the people who lived in the neighborhood, I know because I lived in the area, was thought to be a Pedophile .
All these incidents were linked an reported to be the work of a gang called the "Crips."
After that you could not walk down the streets in Los Angeles and be black without being accosted by law enforcement. The really ironic thing was, the areas drawn up in the news papers as gang territory didn't exist before before that reporting, sprang up afterwards. Even gang names, many I heard for the first time was during that media blitz.
Hell even the election of G.W. Bush may have hinged on mass media hysteria of Willie Horton.
It does bother and concern me now, with all the NFL domestic violence 24/7 coverage and all the faces I see are African American punctuated by attacks on Roger Goddell.
Hell even the election of G.W. Bush may have hinged on mass media hysteria of Willie Horton.
It does bother and concern me now, with all the NFL domestic violence 24/7 coverage and all the faces I see are African American punctuated by attacks on Roger Goddell.
(Google images)
It is safe to say that Roger Goddell won't be use to paint all white men as people who make bad decisions based on profit. That is not the same for the black NFL players.
I'm reading post, using the universal dog whistle name for blacks, "THEY". They beat their wives, They beat their kids with trees, they make to much money.
Like I said in a earlier blog, black men have enough unfair negative labels to deal with.
I'm pretty sure there are many positive images of black NFL players that can be covered, like Devon Still, his little girl is battling cancer,
I'm reading post, using the universal dog whistle name for blacks, "THEY". They beat their wives, They beat their kids with trees, they make to much money.
Like I said in a earlier blog, black men have enough unfair negative labels to deal with.
I'm pretty sure there are many positive images of black NFL players that can be covered, like Devon Still, his little girl is battling cancer,
and what he did to make sure she receives treatment.
There is no Mass Media Hysteria when blacks do good, but there is plenty of history to prove it exist when blacks do bad. The consequences are never good for blacks either.
How many blacks today will not get a job because the employer, thinks he might beat his wife and kids?
I know to many what I am saying is ridiculous and far- fetched, but I think it needs to be said. Racism still exist in America.